Comparison

GavelSight vs Trellis.law

Both platforms serve litigation attorneys who need judge intelligence before filing. Here is how they differ on coverage, methodology, pricing, and transparency.

Feature GavelSight Trellis.law
Starting price $79/seat/mo Custom pricing (typically $200+/mo)
Federal court coverage All federal districts + circuits Limited federal (state-court focus)
State court coverage Florida live; expanding CA, TX, FL, NY + others
Case outcome prediction Yes, with full methodology disclosure Motion analytics (no explicit prediction scores)
Prediction transparency Confidence intervals, sample size, data caveats Aggregated statistics only
Data source CourtListener (open, auditable) Proprietary court scraping
Judge chat (AI Q&A) RAG over judge opinions (v11) Not available
Opposing counsel analytics Win/loss + head-to-head (v11) Attorney analytics available
Docket alerts Email + Slack/Teams (v11) Email alerts
Client-ready PDF reports One-click export Export available
Free tier 5 lookups/mo, no card required No free tier
Annual contracts required No — cancel anytime Annual contracts typical
Work product protection Never used for training Privacy policy varies

Where GavelSight leads

GavelSight was built for federal litigation with full prediction transparency. Every score surfaces its methodology, confidence interval, sample size, and data caveats. Attorneys can explain the basis for strategic recommendations to clients and co-counsel without relying on opaque aggregate statistics.

The v11 release adds AI-powered chat over a judge's entire opinion record, opposing counsel head-to-head analytics, and trial calendar prediction — features that move beyond static dashboards into dynamic litigation intelligence.

Where Trellis leads

Trellis has deeper state court coverage, particularly in California and Texas trial courts. For practices focused primarily on state-level litigation in those jurisdictions, Trellis offers a broader dataset today. Trellis has also been in market longer and has established integrations with some practice management tools.

Who should choose GavelSight

Solo practitioners and small litigation teams who want affordable, transparent judge intelligence for federal cases. Attorneys who need to explain their analytical basis to clients. Teams that value open data sources over proprietary black boxes. Litigators who want AI-powered features (judge chat, prediction scores, opposing counsel analytics) at a fraction of enterprise pricing.

Try GavelSight free

5 judge lookups per month, no credit card required. See the difference for yourself.

Get Started Free

Browse our full judge directory or read about our data methodology.