Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
c10:Nos. 316, 317, and 318
Mr. Chief Justice Hughes, dissenting: I agree with Mr. Justice Stone’s analysis of the facts showing the nature of the employment of Dunmore and Lowell, and with his conclusions as to the legal effect of that .employment.' As the people of the United .States should have the unrestricted benefit of the inventions in such'a case, I think that the appropriate remedy would be to cancel the patents.