Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
873 F.3d 829
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, concurring: I join the majority opinion, including Part III.B, because the district court erred in admitting the testimony about Preston’s masturbation to establish intent. The government provided no other rationale when seeking to, introduce this evidence at trial. In the event of a retrial, I do not read our ruling as precluding the government from identifying a different basis on which to seek admission of the testimony, such .as to show that Preston was sexually aroused by young boys.