Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-azd-4_19-cv-00422-14

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · 2024-06-21

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:23:11

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff's oral motion to reconsider the dismissal of the portion of Count Three of the First Amended Complaint alleging a lack of a functioning duress alarm in Plaintiff's cell. It is further ordered denying Plaintiff's oral motion for a new trial. It is further ordered denying as moot Plaintiff's Emergency Motion to Secure Impeachment Witness (Doc. 245). It is further ordered finding Defendant not liable with respect to the portion of Count Three alleging that USP-Tucson staff negligently responded to reports that Plaintiffs cellmate was threatening her. It is further ordered finding Defendant liable to Plaintiff in the amount of $10,000.00 with respect to the portion of Count Three alleging that Defendant was negligent in failing to ensure that Plaintiff's cell had a functioning duress alarm. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment finding Defendant liable to Plaintiff in the amount of $10,000.00, and shall close this case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 6/20/2024. (ARC)

Passage view · GavelSight