Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-ncmd-1_25-cv-00967-2

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina · 2026-06-02

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:45:08

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
JENNIFER JEAN COSSIO, ) 
 ) 
 Plaintiff, ) 
 ) 
 v. ) 1:25cv967 
 ) 
RAY ARMINI, et al., ) 
 ) 
 Defendants. ) 
 
ORDER 
 
On January 22, 2026, the Recommendation of the United States 
Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties in 
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (Doc. 25.) Plaintiff Jennifer 
Jean Cossio timely filed an objection. (Doc. 27.) Cossio then 
also filed a motion to expedite consideration of her objection, 
along with multiple notices of continued financial hardship. 
(Docs. 28, 29, 30.) 
The court has carefully reviewed the portions of the 
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made 
a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s 
report. The court finds that the objections do not change the 
substance of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and the court 
therefore adopts the Recommendation. 
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Cossio’s untimely 
objections to the Text Recommendation dated October 30, 2025 (Doc. 
20) are DENIED. 

2 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Cossio’s motion to expedite 
consideration (Doc. 29) is DENIED AS MOOT. 
 
 /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder 
 United States District Judge 
 
June 2, 2026 

Passage view · GavelSight