govinfo:USCOURTS-flsd-0_25-cv-62489-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO. 25-62489-CIV-SINGHAL/STRAUSS 
 
JAMES VILLAROEL, 
 
 Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
SHADE TUCKER, et al., 
 
 Defendants. 
___________________________________/ 
 
ORDER 
 
THIS CAUSE  is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Strauss’s Report and 
Recommendation, wherein he recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice for 
lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  (DE [7]).  “When no timely objection is filed, the court 
need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to 
accept the recommendation.”  See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes; see 
also, e.g., Sully v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2024 WL 1857456, at *8 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2024) 
(Altman, J.) (same); Stephen v. United States , 2016 WL 9649870, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 
29, 2016) (Cohn, J.) (same).  Having reviewed the Complaint (DE [1]) and the Report and 
Recommendation (DE [7]), the Court discerns no clear error.  Accordingly, it is hereby 
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that  
1. The Report and Recommendation (DE [7]) is ADOPTED; 
2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (DE [1]) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 
Case 0:25-cv-62489-AHS   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2026   Page 1 of 2
3. Should Plaintiff desire to re -assert his claims, he must file a separate action 
under a new case number and notify the Clerk that the new lawsuit is related 
to this one; 
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case, CANCEL all deadlines and 
hearings, and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. 
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 2 2nd day of 
April 2026. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF  
 
 
 
Case 0:25-cv-62489-AHS   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2026   Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight