Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

c46:

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York · 1929-10-17

· GavelSight synced 2026-06-04 23:48:47

Benedict, J.
I concur with the commissioner m fus conclusion that the libelant Ubenezer Day is not entitled to recover anything in this action. I also concur in his conclusion that Albert A. Eneas is not entitled to recover anything in this action.
The exceptions in behalf of the above-named libelants are, therefore, overruled, and the report confirmed.
See The De Smet, 10 Fed. Rep. 483, and note, 491; The Minna, 11 Fed. Rep. 759, and note, 760.

Passage view · GavelSight