Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-insd-1_25-cv-00864-1

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana · 2026-04-14

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:39:19

1 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 
 
COUNT US IN, et al., )  
 )  
Plaintiffs, )  
 )  
v. ) No. 1:25-cv-00864-RLY-MKK 
 )  
DIEGO MORALES, et al., )  
 )  
Defendants. )  
 
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 
Today, the court found that Plaintiffs Count US IN, Women4Change Indiana, and 
Josh Montagne have a reasonable likelihood of succeeding on the merits of their claim 
that Defendants Diego Morales, Paul Okeson, Suzannah Overholt, Karen Celestino-
Horseman, Litany Pyle, Bradley King, Angela Nussmeyer, and the Monroe County Board 
of Elections imposed an undue burden on their right to vote in violation of the First and 
Fourteenth Amendments.   
Accordingly, the court ISSUES A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ordering 
that the parties; their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and any other 
persons who act in concert with the parties or their agents, servants, employees, and 
attorneys, are prohibited from enforcing SB 10, to the extent that it prohibits voters from 
using documents issued by educational institutions as proof of identification, until this 
case has been finally resolved. 
Case 1:25-cv-00864-RLY-MKK     Document 99     Filed 04/14/26     Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
2 
 
The court waives the security requirement of Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of April 2026. 
 
        s/RLY 
 
Distribute Electronically to Registered Counsel of Record. 
 
Case 1:25-cv-00864-RLY-MKK     Document 99     Filed 04/14/26     Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight