Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-dcd-1_25-cv-04218-4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________
)
THE NEW YORK TIMES )
COMPANY, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 25-04218 (PLF)
)
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al. )
)
Defendants. )
____________________________________)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Appeal
[Dkt. No. 58]. Defendants ask the Court to stay its Orders of March 20, 2026 [Dkt. No. 34] and
April 9, 2026 [Dkt. No. 54] to the extent that those Orders vacate and enjoin the enforcement of
the Department of Defense’s physical access restrictions for the Pentagon—namely, the escort
requirement and closure of the Correspondents’ Corridor. In the alternative, defendants request a
fourteen-day administrative stay of those Orders to the same extent to allow for orderly briefing
on defendants’ forthcoming stay motion in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Upon
careful consideration, it is hereby
Case 1:25-cv-04218-PLF Document 59 Filed 04/13/26 Page 1 of 2
2
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Appeal [Dkt. No. 58] is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants’ request for a fourteen-day administrative
stay is GRANTED, and the motion is otherwise DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN
United States District Judge
DAT
E: April 13, 2026
Case 1:25-cv-04218-PLF Document 59 Filed 04/13/26 Page 2 of 2