Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-cod-1_04-cr-00514-44

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado · 2008-09-26

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:26:14

OAO 247 (02/08)   Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of Colorado
United States of America )
)
)
)
)
)
v.
LAMAR BRANT Case No: 04-cr-00514-EWN-06
USM No: 33167-013
Date of Previous Judgment: February 6, 2006 Alaurice Tafoya-Modi, Appointed
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney
Order and Amended Judgment Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of X the defendant ’ the Director of the Bureau of Prisons ’ the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
X DENIED. ’ GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 
the last judgment issued) of is reduced to .
I.  COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)
Previous Offense Level: 29 Amended Offense Level: 29
Criminal History Category: V Criminal History Category: V
Previous Guideline Range: 140 to 175 months Amended Guideline Range: 140 to 175 months
II.  SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
’ The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.
’ The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time 
of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the
amended guideline range.
’ Other (explain):
III.  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated February 6, 2006, shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Edward W. NottinghamOrder Date: September 26, 2008
Judge’s signature
Effective Date: Edward W. Nottingham, Chief U.S. Probation Officer
(if different from order date) Printed name and title
Case No. 1:04-cr-00514-SKC     Document 1822     filed 09/26/08     USDC Colorado     pg
1 of 1

Passage view · GavelSight