govinfo:USCOURTS-casd-3_26-cv-02111-5

- 1 - 
26cv2111 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
SCOTT DESROSIERS, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
DR. MILDRED GARCIA, et al., 
Defendants. 

 
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 
MOTION TO ELECTRONICALLY 
FILE DOCUMENTS (ECF No. 15) 
 
 
 
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Scott Desrosiers’s motion requesting leave to 
file electronically using PACER-CM/ECF. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff, however, fails to state 
he has the necessary equipment and capabilities to electronically file documents or that he 
can ensure his compliance with ECF Administrative Policies and Procedures. Cf In re 
Cisse, No. 20-CV-01694-BAS-WVG, 2020 WL 6561426, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2020). 
The Court therefore DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 15.) This decision is 
made without prejudice, and Plaintiff may renew his motion with additional information 
Case 3:26-cv-02111-BAS-DEB Document 17 Filed 06/12/26 PageID.<pageID> 
Page 1 of 2
 
- 2 - 
26cv2111 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
regarding his capacity to file electronically and his compliance with ECF Administrative 
Policies and Procedures. Additionally, the Court notes Plaintiff can file motions and 
associated papers with the Court via mail service if he chooses not to renew his motion. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
DATED: June 12, 2026 
 
 
Hon. Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge 
United States District Court 
Case 3:26-cv-02111-BAS-DEB Document 17 Filed 06/12/26 PageID.<pageID> 
Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight