govinfo:USCOURTS-flsd-1_26-cv-20880-0

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 

 
TRAYON WILLIS, 
 
 Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
MIAMI DADE COUNTY, et al., 
 
 Defendants. 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate 
Judge Lisette M. Reid (the “Report”). [ECF No. 14, 15]. On February 19, 2026, the Court referred 
the case to Judge Reid for a ruling on all pretrial non -dispositive matters and a report and 
recommendation on all dispositive matters . [ECF No. 10]. On May 28, 2026, Judge Reid issued 
her Report, recommending that Plaintiff’s Complaint, [ECF No. 1], should be dismissed without 
prejudice for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend his C omplaint within thirty (30) days. 
[ECF No. 14]. No party filed objections to the Report. 
A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 
recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The objected portions of the report and recommendation 
are accorded de novo review if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party 
disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ. 
P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objection is made 
are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C. , 
199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 
______________________________/ 
Case 1:26-cv-20880-DPG Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2026 Page 1 of 2
2 
 
784 (11th Cir. 2006). Given that the parties have not objected to any portion of the Report, the 
Court reviewed the Report for clear error. Finding no clear error , the Court agrees with Judge 
Reid’s findings and conclusion that Plaintiff’s Complaint should be dismissed with leave to amend. 
CONCLUSION 
Therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 
1. The Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 14, 15], is ADOPTED in full. 
2. Plaintiff’s Complaint, [ECF No. 1], is DISMISSED without prejudice. 
3. Plaintiff shall have until July 12, 2026, to file an Amended Complaint. 
4. The case is CLOSED for administrative purposes pending Plaintiff’s filing of his 
Amended Complaint. 
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 12th day of June, 2026. 
 
 
________________________________ 
DARRIN P. GAYLES 
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
 
Case 1:26-cv-20880-DPG Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2026 Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight