Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-paed-2_06-cr-00690-10
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION v. : : No. 06-cr-690-1 LAN DANG ORDER AND NOW, on this 26th day of November 2025, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for a Reduction in Sentence (ECF No. 559), the Government’s Opposition (ECF No. 562), Defendant’s Pro Se Reply (ECF No. 564), Defendant’s Counseled Reply (ECF No. 567), the Government’s Sur-Reply (ECF No. 568), Defe ndant’s Counseled Sur -Reply (ECF No. 571), argument made at the hearing on July 23, 2025 (ECF No. 581), and the record before this Court, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks a determination that Defendant presents an “extraordinary and compelling” reason warranting a reduction in sentence; 2. The Motion is DEFERRED insofar as it seeks a determination as to an appropriate sentencing modification; 3. The Government shall brief its position on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and on whether Mr. Dang remains “ a danger to the safety of any other person or to the community, as provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g),” see U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(a)(2), by noon on December 10, 2025. BY THE COURT: /s/ CHAD F. KENNEY __________________ CHAD F. KENNEY, J.