Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-paed-2_18-cr-00579-21
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARTHUR ROWLAND CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 18-579-2 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of March 2026, upon consideration of Rowland’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody, (Dkt. No. 546), the Government’s Response in Opposition, (Dkt. No. 548), Rowland’s Reply in Support of § 2255 Motion, (Dkt. No. 551), Rowland’s Motion for Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing, (Dkt. No. 553), and the Government’s Response in Opposition, (Dkt. No. 558), it is ORDERED that: 1. Rowland’s Motion Under § 2255, (Dkt. No. 546), is DENIED. 2. Rowland’s Motion for Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing, (Dkt. No. 553), is DENIED. 3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue. 4. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE the case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert Gerald J. Pappert, J.