Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-paed-2_18-cr-00579-21

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · 2026-03-06

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:49:33

1 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 v. 
ARTHUR ROWLAND 
 
 CRIMINAL ACTION 
 NO. 18-579-2 
ORDER 
 AND NOW, this 6th day of March 2026, upon consideration of Rowland’s Motion 
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in 
Federal Custody, (Dkt. No. 546), the Government’s Response in Opposition, (Dkt. 
No. 548), Rowland’s Reply in Support of § 2255 Motion, (Dkt. No. 551), Rowland’s 
Motion for Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing, (Dkt. No. 553), and the Government’s 
Response in Opposition, (Dkt. No. 558), it is ORDERED that: 
1. Rowland’s Motion Under § 2255, (Dkt. No. 546), is DENIED. 
2. Rowland’s Motion for Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing, (Dkt. No. 553), 
is DENIED. 
3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue. 
4. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE the case. 
 
 BY THE COURT: 
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert 
 Gerald J. Pappert, J. 
 

Passage view · GavelSight