govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-3_24-cv-05677-1

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
 
 
 
 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
BRANDON MASJEDIAN, et al., 
Plaintiffs, 
v. 
 
CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL 
ASSOCIATION, 
Defendant. 
 

 
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER 
PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE 
SEALED 
Re: Dkt. Nos. 66 and 86 
 
 
Before the Court are defendant’s administrative motions: (1) “to Consider Whether 
Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed," filed February 20, 2026, whereby defendant 
seeks leave to file under seal the unredacted version of its motion for summary judgment, 
as well as a number of exhibits attached thereto, on the ground that plaintiffs have 
designated as confidential certain portions therein; and (2) “to Consider Whether Another 
Party’s Material Should Be Sealed,” filed April 3, 2026, whereby defendant seeks leave to 
file under seal the unredacted version of its reply in support of summary judgment on the 
ground that plaintiffs have designated as confidential certain portions therein. 
Plaintiffs have failed to file a responsive declaration. See Civil L.R. 79-5(f)(3) 
(providing “within 7 days of the motion's filing, the Designating Party must file a statement 
and/or declaration”; incorporating Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(1) requiring declaration set forth “the 
reasons for keeping a document under seal”). Consequently, defendant’s motions will be 
denied. Plaintiffs did file, however, their own motion to seal (see Doc. No. 91), which 
motion overlaps in part with defendant’s motions. 

 
2 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
Accordingly, defendant’s motions are hereby DENIED, and, to the extent the Court 
has granted an overlapping request made by plaintiffs, such denial is without prejudice. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated: June 15, 2026 
 MAXINE M. CHESNEY 
 United States District Judge 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Passage view · GavelSight