govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-5_25-cv-05244-1

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN JOSE DIVISION 
KIM KEMPF, et al., 
Plaintiffs, 
v. 
APPLE INC., 
Defendant. 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 
REGARDING DISMISSAL 
Re: ECF No. 31 
On March 18, 2026, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint in 
compliance with its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 
within 21 days. See Dismissal Order, ECF No. 31. Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint 
by April 8, 2026. 
Defendant subsequently moved for dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules 
of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 32. Plaintiffs did not oppose this motion or otherwise respond. 
THE COURT hereby issues an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Plaintiffs’ claims should 
not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 
Procedure. 
If Plaintiffs fail to file a written response to this Order to Show Cause by June 22, 2026, 
the case shall be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 
\\\ 
\\\ 
\\\ 

2 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: June 15, 2026 
______________________________________ 
EDWARD J. DAVILA 
United States District Judge 

Passage view · GavelSight