Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-casd-3_25-cv-02756-0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MAURICE GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. JEFF MACOMBER, Respondent. Case No. 25-cv-08498-HSG ORDER OF TRANSFER Petitioner, a parolee currently living in Walnut Creek, California, has filed this pro se action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his 2019 sentence. See generally ECF No. 1. Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in San Diego County, which is in the Southern District of California. Id. Petitioner currently resides in the Northern District of California. Id. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). However, a petition challenging the sentence imposed is preferably heard in the district of conviction and sentencing. See N.D. Cal. Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b); see also Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767-68 (N.D. Cal. 1993). Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in the Southern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 10/14/2025 Case 3:25-cv-02756-RBM-VET Document 3 Filed 10/14/25 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1