govinfo:USCOURTS-gand-1_20-cv-03690-4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
STATESBORO DIVISION 
WASEEM DAKER, 
Plaintiff, 
V. 	 6: 14-cv-47 
PATRICK HEAD; JESSE D. EVANS; 
MARY E. STALEY; BRIAN OWENS; 
TIMOTHY WARD; RANDY TILLMAN; 
RICK JACOBS; ROBERT E. JONES; 
CARL HUMPHREY; DR. SHARON 
LEWIS; SHEVONDAH FIELDS; LISA 
FOUNTAIN; TORIS MCLESSIA 
ROZIER; JAMES DEMETRIUS 
SMITH; GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF 
CORRECTIONS; ROBERT TOOLE; 
WENDELL FOWLER; JOHN PAUL; 
Ms. KILGORE; Mr. DELOACH; 
MILTON SMITH; MURIEL JACKSON; 
JOHN DOE; JANE DOE; DR. JOHN 
DOE; DR. JANE DOE; Ms. KING; P. 
MURPHY; Off. HENRY; Ms. BROWN; 
THREE JOHN DOES; BRUCE 
CHATMAN; JUNE BISHOP; DR. DEAN 
BROOME; Mr. CARAVELLO; 
WILLIAM McNUNN; STEPHEN 
NICOLOV; SHARON BROWN; Ms. 
LIGHTSEY; Ms. CROWDER; Ms. 
STRICKLAND; Ms. DOBBS; Ms. 
SIC VERS; Ms. CO WART; Ms. BRADY; 
TIFFANY WOOTEN; Mr. 
THURMOND; DEBBIE KING; Major 
SMITH; Sgt. SALGADO; RONNIE 
SHUEMAKE; TARAL TODMAN; 
BENJAMIN WARREN; AS WON 
CAULEY; FREDDIE DAVIS; JAMES 
McMILLAN; MICHAEL NUPEN; 
TORJKA NASH; LESLEY MEDLOCK; 
and SARAH BARBER, 
ORDER 
Waseem Daker has moved this court to 
amend its judgment dismissing his 
complaint. ECF No. 23. In support of his 
motion, he offers "the same reasons set forth 
in his objections to the magistrate's 9/8/14 
report & recommendation." Id. at 1. 
However, a Rule 59(e) motion cannot be 
used "to relitigate old matters, raise 
argument[,] or present evidence that could 
have been raised prior to the entry of 
judgment." Michael Linet, Inc. v. Viii. of 
Wellington, Fla., 408 F.3d 757, 763 (11th 
Cir. 2005). Daker's motion is improper 
because he has offered no new argument in 
support of altering the Court's judgment. 
Therefore, the Court DENIES Daker's 
Rule 59 Motion. 
This, day of November 2014. 
A ANT EDENFIELDJDGE 
UNITED STATES DI  CT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
Defendants. 
Case 1:20-cv-03690-SDG     Document 25     Filed 11/04/14     Page 1 of 1

Passage view · GavelSight