Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01936-3

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California · 2024-06-18

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:42:07

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
   
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND DECLARATORY RELIEF CLAIM 
AND FILE PROPOSED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 
CASE NO. 2:23−CV−01936−MCE−AC  
2095580.1 - NATC.BROMAN 
Carlos A. Alvarez (State Bar No. 143839) 
Jill K. Cohoe (State Bar No. 296844) 
STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS 
 ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP 
235 Pine Street, 15th Floor 
San Francisco, California 94104 
Telephone: (415) 421-3400 
Facsimile: (415) 421-2234 
E-mail: calvarez@steyerlaw.com 
 jcohoe@steyerlaw.com 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond Broman 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
RAYMOND BROMAN, 
 
 Plaintiff, 
 
 v. 
 
JENNY L. MARTIN, RICHARD 
MARTIN, INTERNAL REVENUE 
SERVICE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 
DEPARTMENT LIEN GROUP, 
 
 Defendants. 
 
 
Case No. 2:23−CV−01936−MCE−AC 
Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. 
 
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 
DECLARATORY RELIEF CLAIM AND 
FILE PROPOSED THIRD AMENDED 
COMPLAINT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:23-cv-01936-DJC-AC     Document 32     Filed 06/18/24     Page 1 of 2
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
{ 2  
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND DECLARATORY RELIEF CLAIM 
AND FILE PROPOSED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 
CASE NO. 2:23−CV−01936−MCE−AC  
 
2095580.1 - NATC.BROMAN 
The Court, having considered plaintiff Raymond Broman’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Leave 
to Amend Declaratory Relief Claim and File Proposed Third Amended Complain (ECF 25) and 
the Statement of Non-Opposition filed by defendants the Internal Revenue Service and California 
Employment Development Department, orders as follows: 
Plaintiff’s Motion is granted.  Plaintiff shall file and serve his proposed Third Amended 
Complaint within ten (10) days of electronic filing of this Order. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated:  June 17, 2024 
  
 
Case 2:23-cv-01936-DJC-AC     Document 32     Filed 06/18/24     Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight