Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-ncmd-6_92-cr-00184-9

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina · 2018-06-04

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:35:05

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EDWARD DANE JEFFUS, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
v. ) 1:16CV1276
) 6:92CR184-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Respondent. )
ORDER
On February 13, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636.  Petitioner filed objections [Doc. #352] to the Recommendation
within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.  The Court has reviewed
Petitioner’s objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the
United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Doc. #350], which is affirmed
and adopted.
To the extent that Petitioner in his objections seeks to compel the Bureau of
Prisons to file a motion to modify his sentence, or otherwise seeks to challenge a
determination by the Bureau of Prisons, it appears that such a challenge was
considered and rejected in the Eastern District of North Carolina on Petitioner’s
Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Case No. 5:15HC2240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5,
2016), and that determination was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Case 6:92-cr-00184-WO     Document 357     Filed 06/04/18     Page 1 of 2
Circuit, Case Nos. 16-7154 (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2017) and 16-7659 (4th Cir. Apr. 21,
2017).  Such a challenge is not properly before this Court. 
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED sua sponte for
failure to obtain certification for this § 2255 application by filing a Motion for
Authorization in the Court of Appeals as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244
and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d), and that, finding no substantial issue for
appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a
debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
This the 4
th day of June, 2018.
     /s/ N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.
             Senior United States District Judge
2
Case 6:92-cr-00184-WO     Document 357     Filed 06/04/18     Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight