govinfo:USCOURTS-njd-2_20-cr-00510-4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
IN RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE : 
EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED  : THIRD EXTENSION OF 
BY COVID-19     : STANDING ORDER 2020-12  
 WHEREAS, the National Emergency and New Jersey State of Emergency and Public 
Health Emergency, declared in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, remain in 
effect; and 
WHEREAS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other public 
health authorities continue to advise taking precautions to reduce the possibility of exposure  
to COVID-19 and to slow the spread of the disease by, among other things, limiting sustained 
group gatherings of people, maintaining six feet of physical distance from others (“social 
distancing”), and limiting sustained indoor activities involving spoken presentations; and 
WHEREAS, in response to governmental policy and health directives, this Court 
previously entered Standing Orders, applicable to all persons, including prospective jurors, 
seeking entry into and occupying this District’s courthouses, which mandate the wearing of face 
coverings (2020-13), establish a COVID-19 protocol for all entrants (2020-14) and institute 
temperature screenings (2020-16); and  
  WHEREAS, this Court also recently entered the Extension of Standing Order 2020-17, 
suspending all in-person proceedings in this District, including criminal proceedings, through 
January 31, 2021, except as is necessary to comply with the provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, 
Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”); and 
  
WHEREAS, this Court is currently in Phase Three of its COVID-19 Recovery 
Guidelines, providing for a phased-in approach to reconstituting operations, and Phase Three 
also directs the wearing of facial coverings, social distancing, and limited elevator occupancy 
in the District’s courthouses, and, consistent with the Extension of Standing Order 2020-17, 
currently prohibits all in-person proceedings, including criminal, except as is necessary to 
comply with the CARES Act; and  
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2020, pursuant to the CARES Act, this Court further 
extended its authorization of the use of video and telephone conferencing for up to 90 days 
thereafter, under certain circumstances and with the consent of the defendant, for various 
criminal case events during the course of the COVID-19 emergency; and  
WHEREAS, the foregoing has been made necessary due to the recent resurgence of 
COVID-19, currently afflicting not just the residents of New Jersey, but those in all of the states 
and territories of the United States, and which has caused record high rates of infection and 
numbers of new cases, and record deaths in a single day; and  
 
 
 
USDC DNJ 
DOCUMENT 
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 
DOC #: ___________________ 
DATE FILED: _______________ 
December 17, 2020
Case 2:20-cr-00510-SDW     Document 29     Filed 12/18/20     Page 1 of 4 PageID: <pageID>
WHEREAS, public health experts expect COVID-19 statistics to worsen before they 
improve, due to the upcoming holidays; and  
WHEREAS, the future availability of approved COVID-19 vaccines to the general 
population is as yet unknown and not expected before March 2021; and  
WHEREAS, jury selection in this District frequently involves the necessity for large jury 
venire pools, often consisting of individuals in or caring for those in the age categories identified 
by the CDC as being particularly at risk, or who are otherwise at substantially enhanced health 
risks for other recognized reasons, along with individuals required to travel extensively; and  
WHEREAS, governmental public health orders still direct that organizations and 
institutions take all reasonable steps to secure the public health through compliance with the 
CDC’s and other governmental and health agencies’ recommendations, including limitations on 
the population size of gatherings, sustained indoor gatherings and requiring the use of face 
coverings, social distancing and other protective measures; and  
WHEREAS, the process of responding to jury summonses and service on juries by those 
employed in essential public functions, including in healthcare operations, those who are at 
increased risk of COVID-19 due to age or other reason, and those who will face substantial 
childcare challenges arising from the closure of schools or curtailment of in-person instruction 
creates a serious impact on the capacity of persons so employed or engaged and summoned to 
serve, increasing substantially the likelihood of the need to summon ever-larger jury venire pools 
for potential service and potentially diminishing the representative nature of the pool of 
summoned jurors; and  
WHEREAS, the resumption of any jury trials in this Court will in many cases involve 
the extensive use of juror questionnaires and more complex voir dire processes, which will 
increase substantially the period of time from the date of initial jury summons to jury selection, 
along with significant limitations on the number of jury trials that can be conducted at the same 
time in any one vicinage of the Court in order to meet the goals of public health protocols; and 
WHEREAS, governmental public health orders have in certain cases materially and 
substantially impaired or wholly curtailed, and continue to impair, the ability of defense counsel 
to engage in necessary case and field investigations and client consultations, particularly but not 
exclusively as to detained defendants; 
WHEREAS, this Court continues to monitor its operations to identify measures that  
will help slow the spread of COVID-19 by minimizing contact between persons, while at  
the same time, preserving its core mission of serving the public through the fair and impartial 
administration of justice; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in order to further public health and safety, the health and safety 
of Court personnel, counsel, litigants, other case participants, jurors, security personnel and the 
general public, and in order to reduce the number of gatherings necessarily attendant to trial jury 
selection in all vicinages of this Court, and in order to minimize travel by participants in Court 
proceedings (particularly travel by public conveyance), the Court finds it necessary to extend  
Case 2:20-cr-00510-SDW     Document 29     Filed 12/18/20     Page 2 of 4 PageID: <pageID>
the continuances and period of exclusion set forth in the Second Extension of Standing Order 
2020-12, due to expire on January 4, 2021, and issues the following: 
1. The Court ORDERS that all civil and criminal jury selections and jury trials shall 
be continued to March 12, 2021.  The Court may issue further Orders or Extensions concerning 
future general continuances of any matters as may be deemed necessary and appropriate. 
Jury selections and trials impacted by this Third Extension of Standing Order 2020-12 (“this 
Extension”) may be reset by further Order of the assigned judicial officer.
2.   Regarding criminal matters, the Cour t recognizes the trial, procedural and  
substantive rights of criminal litigants and particularly, their right to a speedy and public trial 
under the Sixth Amendment (and the particular application of that right in cases involving 
defendants who are detained pending trial).  However, the Court also recognizes the compelling 
public health and safety issues outlined in this Extension, and therefore, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 
§3161(h)(7)(A), finds that the ends of justice served by taking such action materially outweigh 
the best interests of the public and the parties in a speedy trial.  Accordingly, the Court ORDERS 
that the time period of March 16, 2020 through March 12, 2021 shall be “excluded time” under 
the Speedy Trial Act.  Having considered the factors outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B), the 
Court finds specifically, that the failure to grant such continuance would likely make a 
continuation of proceedings impossible, or result in a miscarriage of justice.  Such exclusion is 
necessary to assure that in cases going to trial, there is a full, unhindered, continuously serving 
jury venire and seated jury in every case, which is central to the sound administration of justice.  
Such exclusion of time is also necessary in cases not yet set for trial in order to address the 
reasonably anticipated difficulties in defense counsel communicating or visiting with clients 
(including those detained in locales and facilities under a declared state of emergency), and the 
inherent delay in the scheduling of further trials as a consequence of the exclusion period herein.  
The Court may by further Order or Extension extend the period of exclusion as circumstances 
may warrant, and the assigned judicial officer may, by Order, also do so in connection with any 
specific proceeding.
3. As for criminal cases commenced by complaint, the Court ORDERS that the 30-day  
period established by 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), during which the United States must either obtain an 
indictment or file an information, is continued to March 12, 2021.  Again, recognizing the public 
health and safety issues stated herein, the Court determines that the ends of justice served by 
granting such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and each defendant in a 
speedy indictment and a speedy trial in a criminal case.  Accordingly, the Court also ORDERS 
that the time period of March 16, 2020 through March 12, 2021 shall be “excluded time” in all 
criminal proceedings in this District under the Speedy Trial Act, including those proceedings 
commenced by complaint.  The Court further ORDERS that such continuance shall also apply  
to any time limits established by the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, 18 U.S.C. app. 2, § 2 
(art. III).
4.  The Court ORDERS that, consistent w ith the Extension of Standing Order 2020-17,  
until further Order of the Court, grand jury sittings in this District shall be limited and convened 
only to the extent deemed necessary and warranted under the circumstances.
Case 2:20-cr-00510-SDW     Document 29     Filed 12/18/20     Page 3 of 4 PageID: <pageID>
5. The Court ORDERS that this Extension doe s not alter filing or discovery deadlines,
or deadlines set by the Federal and Local Rules or Court Orders, nor does it toll or extend any 
applicable statutes of limitation.  Judicial officers may, however, apply the principles of 
flexibility and accommodation to reasonable requests for filing or scheduling adjustments 
necessitated by health or safety concerns, or advice or directives of public health officials.   
6. The Court ORDERS that aside from ordering a jury trial, individual judges presiding
over civil and criminal proceedings may take such actions consistent with this Extension and the 
Recovery Guidelines as may be lawful and appropriate to ensure the fairness of the proceedings 
and preserve the substantial rights of the parties.   
7. Consistent with the Court’s prior Orde rs, the Court ORDERS that the requirement
in criminal matters of providing courtesy copies of electronic filings to the Court continues to be 
suspended in all cases, until further Order of the Court.   
8. The Court ORDERS that all Central Viol ations Bureau (CVB) proceedings shall
continue to be conducted, at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, via video and teleconference, 
until the Court orders otherwise.   
9. The Court ORDERS that this Extension doe s not affect the Court’s Third Extension
of Amended Standing Order 2020-06 (“In Re: Video Conferencing and Teleconferencing for 
Criminal Proceedings Under the CARES Act”) or Standing Order 2020-07 (“In Re: Expanded 
Use of Electronic Signatures Due to the Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19”), which 
remain in full force and effect, until further order of the Court. 
10. The Court ORDERS that any litigant may seek such relief from this Extension that
he/she deems necessary due to emergent circumstances.  
11. The Court further ORDERS that additiona l Orders or Extensions addressing Court
Operations Under the Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 shall be entered as 
warranted, and that this Third Extension of Standing Order 2020-12 will expire no later than 
March 12, 2021, unless extended by further Order of the Court.   
DATED:  December 17, 2020            _____________________ 
Hon. Freda L. Wolfson  
U.S. Chief District Judge 
District of New Jersey 
__________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hon. Fredad  L. Wolfllfllflflffllflflfflllfffllllflfflllfflllflllflllfllfllllfllllfllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll son  
US C h i fD i t i t Jd
Case 2:20-cr-00510-SDW     Document 29     Filed 12/18/20     Page 4 of 4 PageID: <pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight