govinfo:USCOURTS-gand-1_25-cr-00272-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
 v.  CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 
CHANTRECE BUGGS,  1:25-CR-00272-SEG-RDC-2 
  D e f e n d a n t .   
  
 
ORDER 
This case is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and 
Recommendation that Defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts Three and Six of 
the Superseding Indictment be denied.  (Doc. 46.)  A district judge has broad 
discretion to accept, reject, or modify  a magistrate judge’s proposed findings 
and recommendations.  See United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 680 (1980). 
No objections have been filed in response to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 
Recommendation. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 59 of the 
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Court ha s reviewed the Magistrate 
Judge’s Report and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. The Court 
ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation as the order of 
Case 1:25-cr-00272-SEG-RDC     Document 48     Filed 02/26/26     Page 1 of 2
 2  
this Court.  Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts Three and Six 
of the Superseding Indictment (Doc. 39) is DENIED.  
It is further ORDERED that the time between the date the Magistrate 
Judge certified Defendant ready for trial on January  30, 2026 (Doc. 46), and 
the issuance of this Order,  shall be excluded in calc ulating the date on which 
the trial of this case must commence un der the Speedy Trial Act because the 
Court finds that the delay is for good  cause, and the interests of justice 
outweigh the right of the public and the right of the defendant to a speedy trial, 
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq. 
SO ORDERED this 26th day of February, 2026. 
 
 
      S A R A H  E .  G E R A G H T Y  
      U n i t e d  S t a t e s  D i s t r i c t  J u d g e  
Case 1:25-cr-00272-SEG-RDC     Document 48     Filed 02/26/26     Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight