govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-06714-2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
   
 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW  
SAN FRANCISCO  
 
 
 
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME 
CASE NO. C 11-06714-JW
 
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580) 
Christopher S. Yates (Bar No. 161273) 
Sadik Huseny (Bar No. 224659) 
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 
San Francisco, California  94111-6538 
Telephone:  (415) 391-0600 
Facsimile:  (415) 395-8095 
Email: Dan.Wall@lw.com 
Email: Chris.Yates@lw.com 
Email:   Sadik.Huseny@lw.com 
 
Attorneys for Defendant 
APPLE INC. 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST 
LITIGATION 
 
CASE NO. C 11-06714-JW 
RELATED CASE NO. C 07-05152-JW  
 
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING 
TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 
APPLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS 
 
[FILED PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-1, 6-2] 
 
Courtroom 9, 19
th Floor 
The Honorable Chief Judge James Ware 
 
 
U
N
ITED
STATES DISTRICTCOURT
N
O
RTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFO
RN
IAIT IS SO ORDERED
Judge James Ware
Case 4:11-cv-06714-YGR     Document 49     Filed 05/14/12     Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
  1
 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW  
SAN FRANCISCO  
 
 
 
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME 
CASE NO. C 11-06714-JW
 
WHEREAS Defendant Apple filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint on 
April 16, 2012; 
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed an opposition to that motion on May 7, 2012; 
WHEREAS the Parties have agreed, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, that Apple’s deadline 
for filing its reply in support of its motion to dismiss be extended from May 14, 2012 to May 18, 
2012; 
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Apple’s deadline for filing its reply in support of its 
motion to dismiss be extended to May 18, 2012. 
 
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 
Authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been obtained 
from each of the signatories, pursuant to General Order 45(X)(B). 
 
Dated:  May 11, 2012 LATHAM & WATKINS 
LLP 
 Christopher S. Yates 
 
By     /s/ Christopher S. Yates  
Christopher S. Yates 
Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 
 
 
Dated:  May 11, 2012 WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN 
 & HERZ LLP 
 Rachele R. Rickert 
 
By     /s/ Rachele R. Rickert  
Rachele R. Rickert 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs PEPPER ET AL. 
 
 
 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated:  May 14 2012   By ____________________________________  
  THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE 
  CHIEF JUDGE 
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 SF\960918 
Case 4:11-cv-06714-YGR     Document 49     Filed 05/14/12     Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight