Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01263-2

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 2011-06-23

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:39:20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
           CASE NO.
Plaintiff(s),          
         
v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS       
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
 
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 
Court Processes:
/c57 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
/c57 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)   (ADR L.R. 5)
/c57 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR  phone conference and may not file this form.  They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 
Private Process:
/c57 Private ADR (please identify process and provider)  ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 
/c57 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 
/c57 other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:___________ ____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:____________ ____________________________
Attorney for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
RICK WOODS, Individually and On Behalf
of Others Similarly Situated
✔
✔
Parties to seek agreement to specific provider after the current motion to dismiss (MTD) is decided.
Parties to seek deadline a greement after current MTD is decided.
5:11-CV-01263-JF
6/17/2011
6/17/2011
Brad E. Seidel
Edward D. Johnson
-----------------
Case 5:11-cv-01263-EJD     Document 50     Filed 06/23/11     Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 
/c57 Non-binding Arbitration 
/c57 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
/c57 Mediation
/c57 Private ADR 
Deadline for ADR session
/c57 90 days from the date of this order.
/c57 other   ___________________
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:________________ ___________________________________
UNITED STATES                            JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket 
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."
✔
✔ See above.
DISTRICT
------------------
6/20/11
Case 5:11-cv-01263-EJD     Document 50     Filed 06/23/11     Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight