Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05519-2

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California · 2006-03-13

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:12:54

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JASON C. SAMUEL, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
v. )
)
)
D. L. RUNNELS, )
) 
Respondent. )
)
___________________________________ )
CV F 04-5519 REC WMW HC
 
ORDER ADOPTING
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS [Doc.
23], DISMISSING PETITION
FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS, AND DIRECTING
CLERK TO ENTER
JUDGMENT FOR
RESPONDENT 
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.  The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.  
On February 16, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
herein.  These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice
to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within
thirty days.  Petitioner filed objections on March 8, 2006.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has
Case 1:04-cv-05519-REC-WMW     Document 25     Filed 03/13/06     Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 2
conducted a de novo review of this case.    See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708
F.2d 452, 454 (9  Cir. 1983).   Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds theth
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.  
 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED  that:
1.  The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 
 February 16, 2006, are a adopted in full;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed;
3.  The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter  judgment for Respondent.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:  March 10, 2006     /s/ Robert E. Coyle     
668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:04-cv-05519-REC-WMW     Document 25     Filed 03/13/06     Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight