Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05796-138

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 2022-04-20

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:37:16

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court Northern District of California 
 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
TODD ASHKER, et al., 
Plaintiffs, 
v. 
 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,   Defendants.  
 
Case No. 09-cv-05796 CW            ORDER VACATING HEARING RE: MOTION FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING 
(Re: Dkt. No. 1632) 
 
 
On April 19, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a motion for de novo determination of the magistrate 
judge’s ruling with respect to a dispute pertaining to Defendants’ practices for redacting 
documents under paragraph 38 of the Settlement Agreement, Docket No. 1632.  Plaintiffs noticed 
the motion for a hearing on June 2, 2022.  Because the motion is suitable for determination 
without oral argument, the Court VACATES the June 2, 2022, hearing.  Defendants may file a 
response to the motion no later than May 3, 2022, and Plaintiffs may file a reply no later than May 
10, 2022.  The Court will decide the motion on the papers. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
  
Dated: 4/20/2022   
CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 
Case 4:09-cv-05796-CW     Document 1634     Filed 04/20/22     Page 1 of 1

Passage view · GavelSight