Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05796-138
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TODD ASHKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. Case No. 09-cv-05796 CW ORDER VACATING HEARING RE: MOTION FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING (Re: Dkt. No. 1632) On April 19, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a motion for de novo determination of the magistrate judge’s ruling with respect to a dispute pertaining to Defendants’ practices for redacting documents under paragraph 38 of the Settlement Agreement, Docket No. 1632. Plaintiffs noticed the motion for a hearing on June 2, 2022. Because the motion is suitable for determination without oral argument, the Court VACATES the June 2, 2022, hearing. Defendants may file a response to the motion no later than May 3, 2022, and Plaintiffs may file a reply no later than May 10, 2022. The Court will decide the motion on the papers. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/20/2022 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge Case 4:09-cv-05796-CW Document 1634 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 1