Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-ksd-6_12-cr-10174-16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs. Crim. Case No. 12-10174-JTM
PHILIP ANDRA GRIGSBY,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Two motions are now before the court. In the first motion (Dkt. 29 2), defendant
Philip Grisby asks that the court strike its July 24, 2018 Order rejecting his request for
collateral relief. (Dkt. 291, filed concurrently in Grigsby v. Baltazar, No. 18-3138-JTM, Dkt.
3). On August 10, 2018, the court denied a similar motion to strike in Grigsby v. Baltazar
(No. 18-3138-JTM Dkt. 10) . The court adopts and incorporates that decision here, a nd
accordingly denies the present motion to strike for the reasons stated therein.
In the second motion (Dkt. 295), Grigsby alleges that the court filed no order
relating to his requests (Dkt. 264, 265, 266) to modify the no-contact order, and that a copy
of the Memorandum Opinion is necessary for him to present his petition for certiorari
from the Tenth Circuit’s decision to the United States Supreme Court. This is not correct.
This court’s Order of December 12, 2017 (Dkt. 267) fully addressed the issue of modifying
the no -contact requirement. The docket shows that a physical copy of the Order was
mailed to Grigsby the same day. The motion is without merit and is denied, although the
Case 6:12-cr-10174-JWB Document 297 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 2
2
court in the interests of justice hereby directs the Clerk of the Court, when mailing a copy
of the present Order to the defendant, to include another copy of the December 12 Order.
IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED this day of of October, 2018, that the defendant’s
Motion to Strike (Dkt. 292) and Motion for Order (Dkt. 295) are denied.
s/J. Thomas Marten
J. Thomas Marten, Judge
Case 6:12-cr-10174-JWB Document 297 Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 2