Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-ksd-6_12-cr-10174-20
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs. No. 12-10174-JTM
PHILIP ANDRA GRIGSBY,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant Philip Andra Grigsby pled guilty to eight counts of sexual exploitation
of a child and was sentenced to a lengthy term of imprisonment and ordered to pay
substantial restitution. (Dkt. 78). This court and the Tenth Circuit have denied numerous
subsequent challenges by defendant to his conviction and the restitution order. (Dkt. 173,
255, 296, 333). Grigsby now moves (Dkt. 338) the court to modify the restitution order so
that payments would be made directly to the victim, who was nine years old at the time
of the crime but has now achieved her majority.
The court hereby strikes the motion, in which Grigsby assumes for himself the role
of a representative of the interests of the victim. Both 18 U.S.C. § 2259(c)(4) and 18 U.S.C.
§ 3771(e)(2)(B) exp ressly prohibit a criminal defendant from acting as a guardian or
representative on behalf of a minor victim. Under the later provision in the Crime Victim
Case 6:12-cr-10174-JWB Document 340 Filed 01/12/21 Page 1 of 2
2
Rights Act, defendant cannot assert the rights of his victim. See United States v. Grigsby ,
784 F. App'x 592, 595 (10th Cir. 2019) (“nor does he [Grigsby] have standing to assert her
rights in any event”).
IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED this day of January, 2021, that the defendant’s
Motion to Modify Restitution is hereby struck for lack of standing.
s/ J. Thomas Marten
J. Thomas Marten, Judge
Case 6:12-cr-10174-JWB Document 340 Filed 01/12/21 Page 2 of 2