Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-insd-2_24-cv-00621-1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
DEREK CORE, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 2:24-cv-00621-MPB-MJD
)
BARNES Sgt., )
)
Defendant. )
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
Magistrate Judge Dinsmore recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff Derek Core's repeated failure to
comply with the court's orders. Dkt. 34. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Dinsmore noted: (1) Mr.
Core's failure to respond to any discovery served by Defendant; (2) Mr. Core's failure to appear at
a December 11, 2025 hearing in person; and (3) Mr. Core's failure to appear at a January 6, 2026
show cause hearing in person; and (4) Mr. Core's failure to otherwise respond to Magistrate Judge
Dinsmore's order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for the preceding failures.
There has not been any objection to the report and recommendation.
The court adopts Magistrate Judge Dinsmore's report and recommendation, dkt. [34], in
whole. See GCIU Employer Retirement Fund v. Chicago Tribune Co., 8 F.3d 1195, 1198-99 (7th
Cir. 1993) ("[A] party cannot decide for itself when it feels like pressing its action and when it
feels like taking a break because trial judges have a responsibility to litigants to keep their court
calendars as current as humanly possible.") (quotation marks and citation omitted). This action is
Case 2:24-cv-00621-MPB-MJD Document 35 Filed 02/03/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). The clerk is directed to enter final judgment
consistent with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 3, 2026
Distribution:
DEREK CORE
1848 Ludlow Ave.
Indianapolis, IN 46201
Eric Ryan Shouse
Lewis And Wilkins LLP
shouse@lewisandwilkins.com
Case 2:24-cv-00621-MPB-MJD Document 35 Filed 02/03/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>