Corpus: 543,329 opinions ·
3,179 judges ·
newest 2026-11-02 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02183-7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AAMIR SALADIN RUSHDAN, Plaintiff, v. YASSER MANSOUR, Defendant. No. 2:24-cv-2183 CSK P ORDER Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 27, 2026, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Following an extension of time, defendants filed a response to plaintiff’s objections. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Case 2:24-cv-02183-DJC-CSK Document 37 Filed 09/30/26 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 32) are adopted in full; 2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 26) is granted; 3. Judgment is entered for defendant Dr. Y. Mansour; and 4. This Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 30, 2026 Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE /rush2183.jo.805.CJRA Case 2:24-cv-02183-DJC-CSK Document 37 Filed 09/30/26 Page 2 of 2