Corpus: 543,329 opinions ·
3,179 judges ·
newest 2026-11-02 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-txed-2_25-cv-01042-0
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, P laintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § C ase No. 2:25-CV-01042-JRG-RSP ORDER Plaintiff previously filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 4.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 100), recommending denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Because no objections have been filed 1 and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 4) is DENIED. 1 The Court notes that Plaintiff has filed a “Notice of Nonobjection,” where it states that while it “respectfully disagrees with particular statements and conclusions in the Court’s Report and Recommendation…[ Plaintiff] does not intend to seek de novo review by the District Judge.” See Dkt. No. 104. . ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of September, 2026. Case 2:25-cv-01042-JRG-RSP Document 106 Filed 09/30/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>