govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-4_26-cv-03542-0

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
EUGENE HART, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
YAHOO INC., et al., 
Defendants. 

ORDER 
Re: Dkt. No. 4 
ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DIRECTING Plaintiff to file his revised 
application to proceed in forma pauperis by June 30, 2026. Plaintiff’s original application to 
proceed in forma pauperis was denied by Judge Kim, Dkt. No. 4, because it did not provide the 
Court with sufficient information to evaluate it. In her order, Judge Kim directed Plaintiff to file 
an amended application by May 28, 2026, but as of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not done 
so. Should Plaintiff fail to file a revised application by June 30, 2026, his complaint will be 
dismissed for failure to prosecute. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: 
______________________________________ 
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 
United States District Judge 
6/16/2026

Passage view · GavelSight