Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-4_26-cv-01176-0

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 2026-06-16

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:49:37

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING VACATUR OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 
SULLIVAN, LLP 
John W. Baumann (Bar No. 288881) 
 jackbaumann@quinnemanuel.com 
865 South Figueroa Street, 10
th Floor 
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 
Telephone: (213) 443-3000 
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 
Stacylyn M. Doore (pro hac vice forthcoming) 
 stacylyndoore@quinnemanuel.com 
111 Huntington Avenue, Suite 520 
Boston, Massachusetts 02199 
Telephone: (617) 712-7100 
Facsimile: (617) 712-7200 
Nathan Archibald (pro hac vice forthcoming) 
 nathanarchibald@quinnemanuel.com 
2755 E. Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 520 
Salt Lake City, Utah 84121-6950 
Telephone: (801) 515-7300 
Facsimile: (801) 515-7400 
Attorneys for Defendant Extend, Inc. 
BALLARD SPAHR LLP 
Stephanie Sheridan (Bar No. 135910) 
 sheridans@ballardspahr.com 
Meegan B. Brooks (Bar No. 240418) 
 brooksm@ballardspahr.com 
Jason C. Hamilton (Bar No. 267968) 
 hamiltonj@ballardspahr.com 
71 Stevenson St., Suite 400 
San Francisco, CA 94105 
Telephone: (415) 318-2770 
Facsimile: (424) 731-8301 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 
MICHAEL FLOWERS, on behalf of himself 
and all others similarly situated, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
EXTEND, INC., 
Defendant. 

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING 
VACATUR OF CASE MANAGEMENT 
CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING 
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S 
MOTION 
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING VACATUR OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 a nd 7-12, plaintiff Mich ael Flowers and defe ndant Extend, Inc. 
hereby stipulate and agree to the following: 
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2026, the Court scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference 
for June 30, 2026 (Dkt. 15) in this matter; 
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2026, defendant filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration, Motion to 
Dismiss, and Motion to Strike Class Allegations (the “Motion”) (Dkt. 16); 
WHEREAS, the Motion was noticed for hearing on July 30, 2026 and re-noticed for hearing 
on August 27. 2026 (Dkt. 21); 
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agr eed that, in light of defendant’s motion to 
compel arbitration, the case management conference should be continued until that motion is resolved. 
See Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski , 599 U.S. 736, 738 (2023) (holding a district court must stay its 
proceedings pending appeal of arbitrability issues); see also Olson v. World Fin. Grp. Ins. Agency, 
LLC, 2025 WL 2243646, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2025) (granting stay “pending resolution of a motion 
to compel arbitration, because if that motion is granted, the arbitrat or will have the authority to 
determine the nature and scope of discovery”). 
WHEREAS, the parties have furt her conferred and agreed that a modest extension of the 
briefing schedule for the Motion will promote efficiency, conserve part y and judicial resources, and 
facilitate ongoing discussions regarding the issues raised by the Motion; 
WHEREAS, the parties therefore jointly request that plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion be 
due on July 13, 2026, and that defendant’s reply in support of the Motion be due on August 12, 2026; 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s 
approval, that (1) the In itial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 30, 2026, be 
vacated and continued to a date after the Court’s resolution of Defendant’s Motion; (2) plaintiff’s 
opposition to defendant’s Motion shall be due on July 13, 2026; and (3) defendant’s reply in support 
of its Motion shall be due on August 12, 2026. 
IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING VACATUR OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION
DATED: June 15, 2026 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 
By
John W. Baumann 
Stacylyn M. Doore 
Nathan Archibald 
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
Stephanie Sheridan 
Meegan B. Brooks 
Jason C. Hamilton 
Attorneys for Defendant Extend, Inc. 
KALIELGOLD PLLC
By /s/ Amanda J. Rosenberg
Amanda J. Rosenberg (CA 2785070 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
E-FILING ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regardin g signatures, I hereby at test that counsel for 
Plaintiff has concurred in this filing. 
By /s/ John W. Baumann 
John W. Baumann 
/s/ John W. Baumann

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING VACATUR OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION
ORDER 
The Court, having considered the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court 
GRANTS the request. 
1. The Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 30, 2026, is 
VACATED. 
2. Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration, Motion to 
Dismiss, and Motion to Strike Class Allegations shall be filed no later than July 13, 2026. 
3. Defendant’s reply in support of its Motion shall be filed no la ter than August 12,
2026. 
4. The Court will reset the Case Management Conference, if necessary, following
resolution of Defendant’s Motion. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
DATED: 6/16/2026
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 
UNITED STATES JUDGE 

Passage view · GavelSight