Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-mnd-0_17-cr-00182-2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
United States of America,
Plaintiff,
v . C a s e No. 17-cr-182 (JNE/LIB)
O R D E R
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen,
Defendant.
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to amend the sentencing
judgment, which was imposed in 2018, to reflect his name change. “[A]lthough an
inmate is entitled to prospective recognition of a legal name change, by means of a ‘dual-
name policy,’ an inmate is not entitled to have documents that pre-dated his legal name
change altered.” United States v. Baker, 415 F.3d 1273, 1274 (11th Cir. 2005) (per
curiam); see United States v. Varner, 948 F.3d 250, 253–54 (5th Cir. 2020); United States
v. White, 490 F. App’x 979, 981–82 (10th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, Defendant’s motion
to amend the sentencing judgment [Docket No. 120] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 5, 2026
s/Joan N. Ericksen
JOAN N. ERICKSEN
United States District Judge
CASE 0:17-cr-00182-JNE-LIB Doc. 121 Filed 06/05/26 Page 1 of 1