Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-txed-4_26-cv-00281-0

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas · 2026-06-15

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:50:29

- 1 - 
No. 4:26-cv-00281 
Izet Becirevic , 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
Bank of America, 
Defendant. 
O R D E R 
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint under Fed-
eral Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Doc. 5. The case was re-
ferred to a magistrate judge, who issued a report recommending 
that defendant’s motion be granted and that plaintiff’s claims be 
dismissed without prejudice. Doc. 7 at 7. Neither party filed ob-
jections. 
When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the 
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face 
of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes 
to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis-
fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find-
ings and recommendations. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 
5) is granted. Any pending motions are denied as moot. 
So ordered by the court on June 15, 2026 . 
 
 J. CAMPBELL BARKER 
United States District Judge PageID #: 
<pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight