Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-pawd-3_26-cv-00822-0
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE LUIS BERNABE REYES, ) ) Petitioner, ) 3:26-cv-00822-CB ) v. ) Chief Judge Cathy Bissoon ) KURT WOLFORD, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is Jose Luis Bernabe Reyes’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Doc. 1. Petitioner currently is an immigration detainee at the Cambria County Prison. He allegedly entered the United States in approximately 2007, and has continuously resided here since. Petitioner was arrested by ICE officials on approximately December 9, 2025, and has remained in custody. There is no indication that Petitioner has any criminal convictions. Petitioner is subject to discretionary detention pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). Respondents rely on decisions by the Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Eighth Circuits to argue that detention is mandatory under § 1225(b)(2)(A). The Court rejects Respondents’ interpretation of § 1225(b)(2)(A), and joins the Courts of Appeals for the Second, Sixth and Eleventh Circuits in holding that the mandatory detention provision only applies to noncitizens apprehended upon entry or shortly thereafter. Tejeda Perez v. Oddo, 3:26-cv-00745-CB, Doc. 8 at 5 (May 28, 2026); see Cunha v. Freden, 175 F. 4th 61, 69, 74-75 (2d Cir. 2026); Lopez- Campos v. Raycraft, 2026 WL 1283891, *2, *4 (6th Cir. May 11, 2026); Hernandez Alvarez v. Warden, Fed. Det. Ctr. Miami, 2026 WL 1243395, *13 (11th Cir. May 6, 2026). Consistent with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition (Doc. 1) is GRANTED, to the extent that it requests a bond hearing in accordance with 8 U.S.C. 2 § 1226(a) and related provisions. Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner with such a hearing, or release him, on or before June 22, 2026. On or before June 29, 2026, Respondents shall file a notice with the Court confirming that Petitioner received a compliant hearing and apprising it of the outcome. The petition is DENIED to the extent it requests any additional relief, although the denial is without prejudice to renewal, as appropriate and necessary. Given that no further action is required by the Court, a Rule 58 judgment will issue and the case will be marked closed. June 15, 2026 s/Cathy Bissoon Cathy Bissoon Chief United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record