Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-casd-3_26-cv-01989-0
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEMETRIUS SMITH, Plaintiff, vs. SAN DIEGO POLICE DEP’T, UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS, Defendants. ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [Dkt. 2]; (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEES REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. §1914(a); Plaintiff Demetrius Smith, currently detained at Los Colinas Detention Facility and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. 1. In lieu of paying the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), Plaintiff has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Dkt. 2. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s IFP motion and dismisses the action without prejudice. I. IFP MOTION A party may institute a civil action without prepaying the required filing fee if the Court grants leave to proceed IFP based on indigency. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Andrews v. Case 3:26-cv-01989-JO-LR Document 4 Filed 06/15/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). Plaintiffs who wish to proceed IFP must establish their inability to pay by filing an affidavit regarding their income and assets. See Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). For prisoners to establish an inability to pay, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires submission of a “certified copy of the[ir] trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6- month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). Here, Plaintiff’s IFP motion is incomplete because he has not included a certified copy of h is trust account statement for the six -month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2. Without a certified trust account statement, the Court is unable to assess whether any initial partial filing fee may be required to initiate the prosecution of Plaintiff’s case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Therefore, the IFP motion is denied. II. CONCLUSION AND ORDER Accordingly, the Court: (1) DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to p roceed IFP [Dkt. 2] and DISMISSES the action without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a) & 1914(a). (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days from the date of this order to re-open his case by either: (a) prepaying the entire $40 5 civil filing and administrative fee in one lump-sum; or (b) filing a renewed motion to p roceed IFP , which includes a prison certificate, signed by a trust accounting official attesting as to h is trust account balances and deposits and/or a certified copy of his Inmate Statement Report for the 6-month period preceding the filing of h is Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). If Plaintiff chooses not to comply with this order by either paying the $405 civil filing fee and administrative fee in full by or submitting a properly supported IFP Motion within forty-five (45) days, this case will remain dismissed without prejudice and without further order of the Court based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Case 3:26-cv-01989-JO-LR Document 4 Filed 06/15/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with a Court-approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 15, 2026 Hon. Jinsook Ohta United States District Judge Case 3:26-cv-01989-JO-LR Document 4 Filed 06/15/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3