govinfo:USCOURTS-casd-3_25-cv-02397-0

1 
25-cv-02397-DMS-DEB 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
QIANA VU, individually and on behalf of 
all those similarly situated, 
 Plaintiff, 
 v. 
BERNICE HASSAN & ASSOC, CPA 
LLC, 
 Defendant. 

 
ORDER DISMISSING CASE 
 
On June 1, 2026, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not 
be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 4 .) Plaintiff did not respond by the 
deadline of June 10, 2026. 
A district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with the district’s Local 
Rules or a court order. See Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 
689 (9th Cir. 2005) (providing “courts may dismiss under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 
41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances”); S.D. Cal. Civ. R. 83.1(a) 
(providing that failure “to comply with these rules . . . or with any order of the Court may 
be grounds for imposition by the Court of . . . sanctions authorized by statute or rule or 
within the inherent power of the Court, including, without limitation, dismissal of any 
actions”). 
Case 3:25-cv-02397-DMS-DEB Document 5 Filed 06/15/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
1 of 2
 
2 
25-cv-02397-DMS-DEB 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court 
is directed to close the case. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: June 15, 2026 
_________________________________ 
Hon. Dana M. Sabraw 
United States District Judge 
 
 
Case 3:25-cv-02397-DMS-DEB Document 5 Filed 06/15/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight