Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-mnd-0_25-cv-03995-0

U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2026-05-07

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:41:55

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 
 
In re: BAIR HUGGER FORCED AIR   MDL No. 15-2666 (JNE/DTS) 
WARMING DEVICES PRODUCTS   ORDER 
LIABILITY LITIGATION 
 
This Document Relates to: 
 
1. Case No. 25-cv-3995 (Boyer v. 3M Company et al) 
2. Case No. 25-cv-4006 (Burbank v. 3M Company et al) 
3. Case No. 25-cv-4007 (Cardwell v. 3M Company et al) 
4. Case No. 25-cv-4009 (Clark v. 3M Company et al) 
5. Case No. 25-cv-4177 (Hall Austin v. 3M Company et al) 
6. Case No. 25-cv-4258 (Kiele v. 3M Company et al) 
 
In a Report and Recommendation dated April 20, 2026, the Honorable David T. 
Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the six actions listed above 
be dismissed with prejudice.  No objection has been filed.  Based on a de novo review of 
the record, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court accepts the recommended disposition 
[Docket No. 3385]. 
Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated 
above, IT IS ORDERED THAT the following actions are DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE.  In each action, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment. 
1. Case No. 25-cv-3995 (Boyer v. 3M Company et al) 
2. Case No. 25-cv-4006 (Burbank v. 3M Company et al) 
3. Case No. 25-cv-4007 (Cardwell v. 3M Company et al) 
4. Case No. 25-cv-4009 (Clark v. 3M Company et al) 
5. Case No. 25-cv-4177 (Hall Austin v. 3M Company et al) 
6. Case No. 25-cv-4258 (Kiele v. 3M Company et al) 
 
Dated: May 7, 2026 
s/Joan N. Ericksen  
JOAN N. ERICKSEN 
United States District Judge 
CASE 0:25-cv-03995-JNE-DTS     Doc. 7     Filed 05/07/26     Page 1 of 1

Passage view · GavelSight