Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-ohsd-2_25-cv-01310-0

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio · 2026-06-16

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:30:57

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 
EASTERN DIVISION 
 
PERSEPHANIE T., 
 Plaintiff, 

 v. Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 
 Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry 
 
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 
 Defendant. 
 
ORDER 
 
 This matter is before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 11.) 
The Parties move the Court to remand this case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four 
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.) The Parties agree this Court should “enter judgment reversing and 
remanding to the agency for further administrative proceedings based on deficits in the 
[Administrative Law Judge’s] consideration of the medical opinion evidence and prior 
administrative medical findings.” (Id. PageID 534.) 
 For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS (ECF No. 11) the Parties’ Joint Motion to 
Remand. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED to the 
Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). This case is 
remanded on the merits to permit the Administrative Law Judge to further consider medical 
opinion evidence and prior administrative medical findings. On remand, the Appeals Council 
will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to further consider Plaintiff’s claim, take any further 
action necessary to complete the administrative record, including offering Plaintiff the 
opportunity for a hearing, and issue another decision. 
 The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and close this case. 
 IT IS SO ORDERED. 
6/16/2026 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 
DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. 
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
Case: 2:25-cv-01310-EAS-CHG Doc #: 12 Filed: 06/16/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight