govinfo:USCOURTS-tnwd-1_25-cv-01207-1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 
 EASTERN DIVISION 
______________________________________________________________________________ 
 
LAUNA RENEE PIGUE, 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
v. No. 1:25-cv-01207-JDB-jay 
 
GIBSON COUNTY SHERIFF’S 
DEPARTMENT, et al., 
 
Defendants. 
______________________________________________________________________________ 
 
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
 _____________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Before the Court is the amended complaint of Plaintiff, Launa Renee Pigue. (Docket Entry 
(“D.E.”) 7.) By administrative order, this matter was referred to the United States magistrate judge 
for management of all pretrial matters and for determination and/or report and recommendation as 
appropriate. Admin. Order 2013- 05. After reviewing the amended complaint, Magistrate Judge 
Jon A. York, on May 28, 2026, recommended that it be dismissed in its entirety for Plaintiff’s 
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (D.E. 8 at PageID 32.) At the end of 
the report and recommendation, Judge York notified the parties that, if they disagreed with the 
recommendation, they were required to file an objection within fourteen days. (Id.) He added that 
“failure to file objections within fourteen (14) days may constitute waiver and/or forfeiture of 
objections, exceptions, and further appeal.” (Id. (emphasis omitted)). 
 No party has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, and the time 
for doing so has expired. Consequently, the parties have forfeited any objections either may have 
had to the report and recommendation. See Berkshire v. Dahl , 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019) PageID
<pageID>
2 
(quoting Kensu v. Haigh , 87 F.3d 172, 176 (6th Cir. 1996)). Accordingly, upon review of the 
record, the report and recommendation (D.E. 8) is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED. Any 
claims Plaintiff may have attempted to assert on behalf of her minor child E.W. and her claims 
against John and Jane Doe defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and all 
remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of June 2026. 
 s/ J. DANIEL BREEN 
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PageID
<pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight