Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-ncmd-1_26-cv-00422-1

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina · 2026-06-16

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:45:08

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
REGINALD UNDERWOOD FULLARD, ) 
 ) 
 Plaintiff, ) 
 ) 
 v. ) 1:26CV422 
 ) 
DETECTIVE B.K. WITCHER et al., ) 
 ) 
 Defendants. ) 
 
ORDER 
On May 12, 2026, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order 
and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties 
in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Objections were filed 
within the time limits prescribed by section 636. (Doc. 6.) 
The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the 
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections were made and has 
made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s 
report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s 
Recommendation. 
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is filed and 
dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to the plaintiff filing a 
new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, and accompanied by the 
$405.00 filing fee. 
 
 /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder 
 United States District Judge 
June 16, 2026 

Passage view · GavelSight