Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-ncmd-1_26-cv-00422-1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA REGINALD UNDERWOOD FULLARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:26CV422 ) DETECTIVE B.K. WITCHER et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On May 12, 2026, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636. (Doc. 6.) The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections were made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to the plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, and accompanied by the $405.00 filing fee. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge June 16, 2026