Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-wiwd-3_26-cv-00248-4

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin · 2026-06-18

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:49:14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN 
  
 
MARK KENNETH ANDERSON, JR., 
 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
 
STATE OF WISCONSIN, ET AL., 
 
Defendants. 
ORDER 
 
26-cv-248-jdp 
 
 
Plaintiff Mark K. Anderson, proceeding with out counsel, alleged that medical staff 
failed to properly treat his medical condition an d he is no longer eligible for a transplant. I 
dismissed this case because the court could not grant him earlier release in this civil-rights 
lawsuit, and in part because Anderson was already bringing a separate lawsuit in this court 
about the alleged inadequate medical care. Dkt. 67. I waived Anderson’s filing fee for this case 
and directed the clerk of court to transfer any payment he had made to his filing fees in his 
other cases. Id. I then denied Anderson’s motions for reconsideration and to return to him the 
payments that he had already made in this case. Dkt. 81.  
Now Anderson again moves to return the payments that he has made. Dkt. 82. I will 
deny that motion. Anderson argues that he has already paid the full fees in his other cases. 
That is incorrect. Court financial records show that Anderson has not paid his other fees, so I 
will continue to direct the clerk of court to apply his payments to another of his cases.  
 
 
 
Case: 3:26-cv-00248-jdp     Document #: 83     Filed: 06/18/26     Page 1 of 2
2 
 
ORDER 
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, Dkt. 82, is DENIED.  
Entered June 18, 2026. 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ 
________________________________________ 
JAMES D. PETERSON 
District Judge 
Case: 3:26-cv-00248-jdp     Document #: 83     Filed: 06/18/26     Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight