Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-txwd-6_24-cr-00122-1

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas · 2026-06-18

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:52:43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
USA
vs.
(1) Derrick Dewayne Johnson
§
§
§
§
§
NO: WA:24-CR-00122(1)-CRW
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the court is the above styled and numbered cause. On February 24, 2026
the United States Probation Office filed a Petition For Warrant or Summons For
Offender Under Supervision for Defendant (1) Derrick Dewayne Johnson, which
alleged that Johnson violated a condition of his supervised release and recommended
that Johnson 's supervised release be revoked (Clerk's Document No. 40). A warrant
issued and Johnson was arrested. On May 20, 2026, Johnson appeared before a United
States Magistrate Judge, was ordered detained, and a revocation of supervised release
hearing was set.
Johnson appeared before the magistrate judge on June 16, 2026, waived his right to
a preliminary hearing and to be present before the United States District Judge at the time
of modification of sentence, and consented to allocution before the magistrate judge. 
Following the hearing, the magistrate judge signed his report and recommendation on
June 16, 2026, which provides that having carefully considered all of the arguments and
evidence presented by the Government and Defendant, based on the original offense and

the intervening conduct of Johnson, the magistrate judge recommends that this court
revoke Johnson supervised release and that Johnson be sentenced to imprisonment for
SIX (6) months, including credit for any time already served since his arrest, and with no
term supervised release to follow the term of imprisonment (Clerk's Document No.
55). 
 A party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings
and recommendations of a magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served 
with a copy of the report and recommendation, and thereby secure a de novo review by
the district court. See 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). A party's failure to
timely file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation
in a report and recommendation bars that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from
attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions
accepted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass 'n, 79 F.3d1415 (5th
Cir. 1996) (en bane). The parties in this cause were properly notified of the consequences
of a failure to file objections.
On June 16, 2026, following the hearing on the motion to revoke supervised
release, all parties signed a Waiver Of Fourteen Day Rule For Filing Objections To
Report and Recommendation OfUnited States Magistrate Judge (Clerk's Document No. 
54). The court, having reviewed the entire record and finding no plain error, accepts
and adopts the report and recommendation filed in this cause.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge filed in this cause (Clerk's Document No. 55 ) is
hereby ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED by this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant (1) Derrick Dewayne Johnson's
term of supervised release is hereby REVOKED. 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant (1) Derrick Dewayne Johnson be
imprisoned for SIX (6) months, including credit for any time already served since his arrest, and
with no term of supervised release. 
 Signed this 18th day of June, 2026.
______________________________
CHRISTOPHER R. WOLFE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Passage view · GavelSight