Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-ohsd-3_25-cr-00016-9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, Case No. 3:25-cr-16
vs.
MICHAEL CHANG, et al., District Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT MICHAEL CHANG’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE (Doc. No. 137); (2) CONTINUING THE TRIAL
DATE FOR ALL DEFENDANTS; (3) EXCLUDING THE TIME FROM JUNE 17, 2026
TO AUGUST 24, 2026 FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION; (4)
FINDING THAT THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT DEADLINE IS OCTOBER 5, 2026; (5)
SETTING TRIAL FOR AUGUST 24, 2026 AT 9:30 A.M.;
AND (6) REQUIRING THE
PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT STATUS REPORT BY AUGUST 10, 2026
______________________________________________________________________________
This criminal case is before the Court upon Defendant Michael Chang’s unopposed motion
to continue the trial date , filed on June 17, 2026, which is before the current Speedy Trial Act
deadline of August 3, 2026. Doc. No. 137. The Court construes the motion as indicating
Defendant Chang has consented to the continuance and waives his rights under the Speedy Trial
Act.
1 See id. at PageID 594. In the motion, Defendant Chang reports that the Government has no
objection to the continuation of trial date. Id . For good cause shown, and pursuant to the
requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, the Court GRANTS Defendant Chang’s unopposed motion
and CONTINUES the trial date.
The Court finds that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(i), after considering the
factors set forth therein, the ends of justice are served by granting a continuance and that such
1 The Court confirms that of the four D efendants charged in this case, Defendant Chang is the only
Defendant still pending trial. See Doc. Nos. 85, 106, 138.
Case: 3:25-cr-00016-MJN-CHG Doc #: 139 Filed: 06/18/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2
continuance outweighs the best interest of the public and D efendants in a speedy trial. Failure to
continue would deny both the G overnment and Defendants the time necessary for effective trial
preparation and the ability to explore all available means of resolving this case. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3161(h)(7).
Consequently, the time from June 17, 2026 until August 24, 2026 is EXCLUDED in
computing the time period set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3161 within which the Government must bring
Defendants to trial. Accounting for the time excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculation, the
new Speedy Trial Act deadline in the instant case is October 5, 2026.2 The Court SETS trial for
August 24, 2026. Finally, the Court REQUIRES the parties to file a joint status report by August
10, 2026.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 18, 2026 s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
2 If counsel disagrees with this calculation, counsel shall file a notice containing their proposed Speedy
Trial Act calculation and deadline.
Case: 3:25-cr-00016-MJN-CHG Doc #: 139 Filed: 06/18/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>