govinfo:USCOURTS-txed-6_26-cv-00059-0

- 1 - 
No. 6:26-cv-00059 
Justin Hemphill, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al., 
Defendants. 
O R D E R 
Plaintiff, a Texas Department of Criminal Justice prisoner 
proceeding pro se, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 
1. The case was referred to a magistrate judge, who issued a report 
recommending that the court dismiss plaintiff’s case without 
prejudice. Doc. 5 at 2. According to the report, plaintiff failed to 
comply with the court’s order to amend his complaint and satisfy 
the filing fee requirement. Id. at 1. Plaintiff received the report but 
did not object. Doc. 6. 
When there have been no timely objections to a report , “the 
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face 
of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes 
to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis-
fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find-
ings and recommendations. This case is dismissed without preju-
dice. Any pending motions are denied as moot. 
So ordered by the court on June 18, 2026 . 
 
 J. CAMPBELL BARKER 
United States District Judge PageID #: 
<pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight