govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-3_26-cv-00330-4

1 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
SAQIB KAFEEL, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
 
APPLE INC., et al., 
Defendants. 
 

 
 
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR 
CLARIFICATION 
Re: Dkt. No. 48 
 
Before the Court is Apple’s administrative motion for clarification. (Dkt. No. 48.) The 
motion is GRANTED. Apple need not file an answer to Plaintiff’s January 12, 2026, complaint 
(Dkt. No. 1) by June 25, 2026. Apple shall respond to either Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended 
complaint or, in the event Plaintiff fails to amend by the July 2, 2026, deadline, Plaintiff’s 
January 12 complaint by July 23, 2026. By June 23, 2026, Apple shall file either a revised 
version of Exhibit B redacting Sections II and III (Dkt. No. 48-3 at 3) or a response to Plaintiff’s 
request to strike and for sanctions. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: June 18, 2026 
 
 
RITA F. LIN 
United States District Judge 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Passage view · GavelSight