govinfo:USCOURTS-cand-4_25-cv-08887-0

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
JUSTIN RUSSO, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
DAVID LIVINGSTON, et al., 
Defendants. 
Case No. 25-cv-08887-AMO (PR) 
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO 
CLOSE/TERMINATE ACTION 
Re: Dkt. Nos. 4, 6, 9, 10, 18, 28, 34 
Before the Court is Plaintiff Justin Russo’s letter dated April 13, 2026 filed in his earlier-
filed action, Case No. 25-cv-08884-AMO (PR), in which he states that the instant matter and Case 
No. 25-cv-08885-AMO (PR) are duplicates of his earlier-filed action. See Case No. 25-cv-08884-
AMO (PR), Dkt. 29 at 1. Specifically, he states: 
. . . I don’t understand why there’s 3 different case #s for those when 
the[y’]re all the same case, I sent 3 copies pe r the court[’]s 
recommendation of the same case inside the same [manila] envelope, 
so why assign 3 different case #s to each case? 
Id. 
In light of Russo’s letter, the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE/TERMINATE this 
action as improvidently opened/filed. No filing fee for this improvidently opened/filed action is 
due. The Clerk shall also file the complaint in the instant matter, see dkt. 1, as the “SECOND 
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT” in Case No. 25-cv-08884-AMO (PR). All pending motions 
are TERMINATED as moot, without prejudice to refiling in Case No. 25-cv-08884-AMO (PR), 
if Russo deems it necessary. Dkts. 4, 6, 9, 10, 18, 28, 34. No further filings will be accepted in 
this matter as it will be closed. Any filings received by the Clerk in this action will be returned to 
Russo. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: 
ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN 
United States District Judge 
6/18/2026

Passage view · GavelSight