Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-dcd-1_26-cv-00499-0

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia · 2026-06-17

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:49:20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
 
 
DARION FREDERICK, ) 
 ) 
Plaintiff, ) 
 ) 
v. ) Civil Action No. 26-00499 (UNA) 
 ) 
 ) 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 
 ) 
 Defendant. ) 
 
MEMORANDUM OPINION 
Plaintiff, appearing pro se , has filed a form complaint and an application to proceed in 
forma pauperis (IFP). For the following reasons, the c ourt grants the IFP motion and dismisses 
the complaint. 
 Plaintiff, a resident of Silver Spring, Maryland, sues the United States for $4 trillion. In 
the statement of claim section, Plaintiff writes only “written documents while present as a citizen 
of the United States of America; I need to be better; I need to be whole.” Compl., ECF No. 1 at 4. 
His baffling Notice, ECF No. 4, is unilluminating. Complaints, as here, lacking “an arguable basis 
either in law or in fact,” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), are frivolous actions subject 
to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Therefore, this case will be dismissed by separate 
order. 
 
 _________/s/____________ 
TANYA S. CHUTKAN 
Date: June 15, 2026 United States District Judge 
 
 

Passage view · GavelSight