Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-txwd-5_25-cv-01532-1

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas · 2026-06-09

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:08:48

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
KIAVI FUNDING, INC., §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-25-CV-01532-FB
§
AJX HOMES LLC, §
§
Defendant. §
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed
in the above-captioned cause on May 1, 2026. (ECF No. 15). To date, no objections to the Report and
Recommendation have been received.1 
Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court
need not conduct a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de
novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations
to which objection is made."). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds its
reasoning to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,
1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989). 
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 15) is ACCEPTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) such that Plaintiff’s
Motion for Final Default Judgment (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED, and this Court will enter a separate
 1 Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate's findings and recommendations must serve and file his, her or its written objections within
fourteen days after being served with a copy of the findings and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 635(b)(1). If service upon a party is made by mailing
a copy to the party’s last known address, “service is complete upon mailing.” FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2)(C). If service is by electronic means, “service is
complete upon transmission.” Id. at (E). 

judgment in the form proposed by Plaintiff, with the exception of the amount of attorney’s fees which
is reduced from $3,349.39 to $3,135. Plaintiff is also entitled to $613.39 in costs, and Defendant will
be required to pay post-judgment interest, calculated and compounded pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961
until the judgment is paid in full. 
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that remaining motions pending with the Court, if any, are
Dismissed as Moot and this case is CLOSED.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED this 9th day of June, 2026. 
 _________________________________________________
 FRED BIERY
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2

Passage view · GavelSight